“Cars 2” is a clunker

The good news is, “Wall-E” no longer bears the shame of being my least-favorite Pixar movie. The bad news? The overly glitzy “Cars 2” has taken its place.

I know there are a lot of people who didn’t like the original “Cars” movie, but I thought it was a lot of fun. It was also the first movie Poppy ever watched, so Lightning McQueen and the gang will always have a special place in my heart.

Even so, I was a little concerned when I heard they were making a sequel to “Cars,” because I couldn’t fathom where they might take the characters and the story. Not that I’m an expert at that sort of thing, but “Toy Story” at least had Andy’s growing up as a ladder on which to build. “Cars” had … ummmm … another racing season? In which McQueen mentors an arrogant up-and-comer? It’s a good thing I’m not in charge, because that would’ve been lame.

But the Pixar actually did make was almost as bad. They turned “Cars” into a James Bond tribute, and the result feels like a direct-to-video release. One of those awful things that have nothing in common with the original save a few characters and a company’s yearning for more dollars (See: “The Return of Jafar“). Except that instead of renting this, I paid a ridiculous amount of money to see it in the theater.

“Cars 2” did have a few laughs here and there, but it was lacking that Pixar warmth that makes their movies so special. (Well, most of them.) I was already having my doubts about “Monsters U.” I’m hoping “Cars 2” isn’t a hint of things to come.

4 thoughts on ““Cars 2” is a clunker”

  1. That bad, huh? I think the only sequel movie we’ve really enjoyed is Ice Age: the Meltdown.

  2. I was thinking about bringing Nola to see this movie this week. Although this is not the first “meh” review I’ve ready. Might have to reconsider.

    1. They liked it, but they haven’t been going “Cars” crazy. Which they’d be doing if they’d loved it.

Comments are closed.