I didn’t make all that much progress on January’s list. Good thing we have an extra day in February this year! Here are some things I’d like to accomplish this month.

I didn’t make all that much progress on January’s list. Good thing we have an extra day in February this year! Here are some things I’d like to accomplish this month.

First! The time of the Oscars is nearly upon us. Which means it’s time to jump on into the Butterscotch Sundae Oscars pool! The victor will receive a a lollipop and a piece of thread. (Or probably not that, but I’ll think of something prize-ish.)
Second! I can’t stop laughing at these Pronunciation Manual videos. There are about a zillion others (or 143). I love these two.
“Hm,” the librarian said as she pulled the book off the holds shelf. “I’ll be interested to hear what you think of this one.”
“Have you read it?”
“No, but people have either really liked it or really hated it.”
And so I started Chad Harbach’s “The Art of Fielding” with trepidation. It’s a baseball story, but it’s also a friendship story and kind of a coming-of-age story and a love story or two. I’ve read a few reviews that liken it to some of David Foster Wallace’s writing, which made me feel rather nice because I had the same thought when I was reading it. I’m not a literary critic, though, so I can’t put a finger on precisely what it is. It’s in the somewhat ridiculous names — Henry Skrimshander, Guert Affenlight — and in the importance of books that only exist in the novel’s world, I think, as well as those other things that I haven’t been able to quantify.
We all know how I feel about Wallace — and if you don’t: I love him so much that I can’t bear to read his final, posthumous novel. I sat with it open to the first page and cried. I’m maudlin and I know it. — so the fact that “The Art of Fielding” reminded me of his work is High Praise. The book is gently written without being dumbed-down, and I found the characters believable and for the most part likable.
I am firmly in the Really Liked It camp.